If you are using your phone, please scroll to the bottom of the page and click "Full Version." You should then be able to see the donation information in the upper right of the home page.
Articles: Advice to the unemployed dancer
Posted 23 July 2009 - 03:51 PM
Sudden Finale: Who and how they feel
Thank you for posting this trythis. It is very important reading for every dancer desiring to dance professionally and every dancer who is dancing professionally. Plus the parents that go along with them.
Posted 23 July 2009 - 04:09 PM
One of the most common struggles I see in dancers transitioning, whether it is from not finding a job at a young age, layoffs, or retirement, is finding a new career that they are even half as passionate about.
Because we are passionate about our work as dancers (and generally have felt this way from a very young age), we start to think that we should feel the same about our next job. But as my family and non-dancer friends often point out, the truth is that very few people actually LOVE what they do.
I hope these dancers don't read those comments, or at least read the encouraging ones too.
Posted 23 July 2009 - 04:11 PM
Posted 23 July 2009 - 06:54 PM
Out of curiosity I just went back and read the comments. Some were rediculous and I didn't have the patience to read all of them. But one person very sympathetically said dancers 'learn to speak with their bodies in ways that leave them feeling partially mute if the dance is no longer there. They learn to feel that their inner beauty is expressed through dance, and its appreciation heard through applause, and when that is gone or diminished, they must rediscover and reinvent themselves in profound ways." I just though that was a very profound way to explain what they must be feeling.
Posted 23 July 2009 - 09:13 PM
Millions of people (including myself) have lost their jobs this year, and here 10 people losing their jobs get a long article written about them. As one commenter pointed out, many of today's unemployed have held the JOBS that they just lost for longer than the dancers in the article have been alive. And they are struggling with a terrific loss of identity. The average Joe will be comparing this article to other articles, for example, about how entire communities in Detroit have lost their job, lost their home, lost their place in the middle class, as the auto industry sheds jobs like dandruff. And these people losing their jobs are in their 50's, they cannot just start over again, they can't even sell their homes these days. According to a recent article, job retraining programs in Michigan have been a failure as well. In this sense, the movie "Billy Elliot" is interesting, since it is a move about a loss of identity through the collapse of an industry, as well as about dance.
Other commenters pointed out a fundamental truth of dance --- maybe not in the nicest way --- that the average dance career is over by the age of 27, which leaves about another 40+ YEARS to do something else in life before the usual retirement age. I believe that any responsible adult counseling young dancers these days would make that fact abundantly clear. Ideally, young dancers should have an inkling of a career transition plan before they get their first dance job. In one sense, a dance career is just plain improbable, and that improbability bubble is bound to end sooner or later. In this case, it ended sooner --- but maybe not that much sooner for some. Either way, it doesn't change the fundamental reality of a long life after the dance career is over. And there are just too many post-professional dancers for the number of non-dancing dance-related jobs, many will have to find jobs in other fields.
I though the comment that trythis cited was particularly insightful.
Posted 24 July 2009 - 07:48 AM
But my experience is that people in these sports deep inside know they are on a ride that will end. Most are out of their sport by age 30. Thatís just life. They donít regret their choice to pursue their passion and move on with life.
In that sense I see no difference between my sports world and the ballet world. Perhaps because sport is competitive and oneís performance is more objectively evaluated than in ballet, there is much less to-do about moving on. Perhaps because sports people are more likely to have graduated from college than ballet people they are more prepared both intellectually and psychologically to move on, I donít know. I doubt that sports people are any more career oriented than ballet people. For most people, careers are something of a random walk through life. The good thing is that young people adapt quickly.
Posted 24 July 2009 - 11:19 AM
'Tis better to have loved and lost than never to have loved at all - From Alfred Lord Tennyson's poem In Memoriam:27, 1850
Posted 24 July 2009 - 11:42 AM
Though I don't sympathize any less with the millions of people losing their jobs this year, my uncle at 62 is included in that statistic, what is more disturbing to me is the feeling of dishonesty behind these dismissals. It is one thing to be told that cutbacks are necessary, or in my uncle's situation that your position is being eliminated. But then months later you find out that they are hiring new people into your position.
Yes, they are young enough to start over. In fact I think currently the average American changes careers 4 times in their life. But I would never think to tell anyone, at any age, to "join the real world" or any number of the other comments originally posted.
On the other hand, I am a firm believer that no one else should be the person to tell you when to stop dancing (aside from occurrences like injuries etc. . .) You may have to be open-minded about the how and the where, but if you want to dance, then dance.
Posted 24 July 2009 - 12:35 PM
"There are, of course, many veterans in the performing arts who have faced and struggled with unemployment. If you are among them ó or are among those who may be hiring them ó what advice would you offer these young dancers?"
It was not about how their job lost was greater then others. Should I feel sorry for all the americans losing jobs when there are starving people in other countries? Yes I feel for both. There were a lot of sour comments.
And when you get the choice to sit it out or dance, I hope you
DANCE....I hope you Dance. Words by Mark Sanders and Tia Sillers
Posted 24 July 2009 - 12:53 PM
I found leaving the career behind was easier with that difference firmly in my mind. There are actually many benefits to leaving behind dancing as a career: more time to do other stuff (and there's plenty of interesting stuff to do in this world), less regimented lifestlye, less stress on your body, more money, more stability. Also, there's more opportunity to have a real impact on the art itself --- not to mention the communities surroundin the art --- when one is off stage. Ballet is run by artistic directors, managing directors, choreographers and boards; dancers have comparatively little input into the finished work. Realizing all this, leaving it behind became easier and easier.
The most memorable scene for me in Billy Eliot was the riots throughout the neighborhood that his big brother was involved in. I believe there's some historical accuracy to that scene as well. I saw Billy's father as knowing his son needed to enter a different world from his own, just not knowing how or what. So he was supportive, but also fearful of what he did not know.
"Kid from the wrong side of the tracks grows up and joins the elite world of ballet" is the class mobility story that seems to be deeply ingrained in our ballet psyche --- all the way back to the Imperial ballet schools that would scour the countryside for children they though they could train well. But I remain deeply suspicious of the applicability of that mythology in the real world --- due to the low pay, short careers and low employment numbers inherent in the field.
Posted 24 July 2009 - 07:47 PM
I have seen so many young dancers not dance because company "____" laid them off, or did not hire them. While I think it is wonderful to have goals, it just may not be the time or place for you to dance at that specific company.
I know dance jobs were limited this year, but jobs were still offered. Maybe time or resources did not allow them all to find jobs this year, but maybe next year.
Posted 24 July 2009 - 08:54 PM
It sounds like Mr. Martins was "getting rid of dead wood." I realize these dancers aren't dead wood. One thing my husband and I have seen is that the people who (1) seem the least bit unreliable, (2) don't blend well with the group or (3) are at the top of the pay scale, are the first ones eliminated. Not because their position isn't neccessary but because the company wants to make room for cheaper workers. Bosses won't come right out and say I'm laying you off so I can hire someone at half your pay. It's something that happens everywhere though.
Posted 24 July 2009 - 09:53 PM
I have seen so many young dancers not dance because company "____" laid them off, or did not hire them.
Yes, I've heard of that attitude. I've been told that the Joffrey School actually had a higher placement rate than SAB. The kids at SAB, it seems, were more likely to dance only for company X, or else not at all. Whereas the kids at Joffrey were willing to dance for anyone who would hire them.
Which is the more "right" attitude? I don't know. I suppose it depends on one's goals. Being a professional dancer has a high opportunity cost.