thebill Posted June 28, 2004 Report Share Posted June 28, 2004 Footed or not and why? Quote Link to comment
Dance_Scholar_London Posted June 28, 2004 Report Share Posted June 28, 2004 I prefer non-footed as they feel more comfortable. I think this is mainly due that they fit better in lenght as for the footed once, I have always the feeling that the tights are tending to "slip down my leg" towards the foot. Quote Link to comment
Mel Johnson Posted June 28, 2004 Report Share Posted June 28, 2004 To tell the truth, it never made a lot of difference to me. Quote Link to comment
BarreTalk Posted June 29, 2004 Report Share Posted June 29, 2004 footed tights advantages -don't have to wear socks -easier to find -bottom of tights can't climb up your leg -tradition non-footed tights advantages -if you're tall, they fit better -can wear socks without creating a double layer -last longer because the toes and soles can't prematurely wear out Quote Link to comment
Hans Posted June 29, 2004 Report Share Posted June 29, 2004 I always made my own convertible tights--just cut a circle in the bottom of the foot and you can have footed tights for performance and footless for class. Quote Link to comment
Guest Maverick Posted June 29, 2004 Report Share Posted June 29, 2004 I've tried both. The non-footed seem to work best for me, as they seem not to sag as much. I am 6'1" so I suspect height may factor in here somewhere. However, I can't say it makes much difference in the overall scheme of things. Whatever works for you, works for you. Quote Link to comment
Guest Danzin Boy Posted July 19, 2004 Report Share Posted July 19, 2004 Hi I would go for the non footed tights because then they last you longer and also they are more comforable as well as the fact that you can roll then up if your hot Danzin Boy Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.