Jump to content
Ballet Talk for Dancers

Magazines: Suzanne Farrell profile


Recommended Posts

I'm going off-topic to recall my days in book advertising when publishers thought it a selling point to describe what they'd published as "readable." The highest accolade was calling something "compulsively readable." :rolleyes:

Link to post
  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Alexandra

    8

  • dirac

    7

  • Farrell Fan

    6

I'm all for readability; the Acocella piece certainly was that. But the New Yorker *used* to have a reputation of readable prose that also told us something new (weren't parts of Taper's Balanchine bio first printed there?). I really don't mean to fault JA--she's got a lot to do with very little space and, I imagine, time and resources.

Link to post

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...